The Orphan's Tale: A Novel – A NYT Bestseller Historical Fiction Story of WWII Survival

I think NPR said it best: "Christina Baker Kline's ‘Orphan Train’ has collided with the circus caravan from Sara Gruen's ‘Water for Elephants,’ and out of wreck has come Pam Jenoff's ‘The Orphan's Tale.’ The novel is a magical carnival saga, a bit grittier than either of its antecedents, and with more at stake...Jenoff has written a tribute to the human spirit that soars in the midst of epic despair." And I ask you, “How could I pass this up?” In short, I didn’t. I quickly moved this one up to the top of my TBR pile and dug right in. We start with a prologue where an elderly woman makes her way into a new exhibit on European circuses. Based on the dust jacket, I know that it’s either Noa or Astrid. By the time I reached the prologue’s end, I was hooked. Then the story moves back in time to Germany, 1944. When Noa is sixteen, she is kicked out of her parents’ home when she discovers she is pregnant by a German officer. While we only see her after she has given up her baby, we see that she has lost none of that innocence that got her in the family way. Noa is cleaning a train station and lives in a closet. One night, a train pulls in. Thinking she hears a baby crying, Noa inspects the boxcars and finds a horrific sight. One of the cars’ floor is covered with babies, none more than two years old. Most are dead, frozen, but she pulls one out. Taking the child, she runs away in the middle of a blizzard. She is found by Astrid and is taken in. Astrid is one of Europe’s leading aerialists, but with a war raging, she is not with her family circus. Instead, she is with her neighbor’s family circus. The Neuhoff Circus needs another aerialist, so Noa must take to the trapeze to earn her place in these strangers who become family. The young women become close. Almost as if they were sisters, watching out for each other. Noa kept the baby she stole and named him Theo. One of the major hurdles that they face, is that Astrid is Jewish. The story is the tale of the circus and its people. I loved reading about how Astrid trained Noa and circus life in the 1940s. The book ends with an epilogue that gives complete closure to all the supporting characters. It was nice to learn their fate. The story did get sluggish in the bottom part of the first third. I wanted to give The Orphan’s Tale receives 6 stars, but that blip caused me to award 5 out of 5 stars in Julie’s world.

Reviewer: D. Goin Pam Jenoff calls the folks at MIRA books her "dream team." Well, she'd better wake them up, because they let slip by--what? Call them style quirks-- and errors that, like leeches, suck blood from and bog dowm one of the best stoties I have read in yeatrs. Ms. Jenoff is clearly a great story teller, who has researched her work well and drawn her characters finely. One cam see, hear, smell, feel and even taste her scenes. Yet, I can agree with some of the one-star reviewers who call the tale boring. To me, "boring" is a bit harsh. Yet, one does become weary spending so much time in Noa and Astrid's heads, listening to backstory repeated endlessly and hearing for the umpteenth time how guilty Noa feels about lying about her past. We get it, okay? I mentioned style qrirks. Both Noa and Astrid appear to be all-knowing, forever in terpreting what other characters say. For ecample, Noa is the poin-of-view character observing Peter and Astrid. Peter says somerhing to. Astrid and Noa notes, "But she (Astrid) turns away from him, her pride too hurt to let him close." How in the world can Noa know why Astrid turns away. Noa might say, "But she turned away, as if her pride..." This psychoanaalysis by POV characters goes on throughout the book, imparting the wiadom of the author rather than of the characters. Another style quirk thar makes no sense to me is the interruption of dialogue to get back i nto the POV character's head. For example, in a scene where Astrid is the POV character and where Noa suggests she and Astrid help the workers putting up the tent, Astrid shakes her head and says, "No, let them do their work." Then we go into Astrid's head, when she thinks the following: We can no more help raise the tent than the workers can swing from the trapeze. Why not make this last sentence part of her response to Noa, which would, as dialogue always does, allow deepening characters and the conflict between them? Above, l also mentioned errors. I will point out two of the most prevalent: First, showing and telling at the same time. Showing is always better, but certainly not both. For example, in a scene where the police are arresting an old man and his granddaughter, the old man stalls for time "The policeman will hear none of it." (telling) "'Now," says the policeman. (showing). Telling is heavy-handed throughout the story. The second and more egregious error involves getting the past tense of verbs mixed up with the past perfect (pluperfect) tense. This happens frequently. For example, Astrid thinks, "I see his face more vividly than I had in months." This should read "...than I have in months." To use "had," she would need to establish a past event, before which something happened. She could think, for example, "I saw his face clearly, yesterday. I had not thought of him for months before that." Enough! This is a damn fine story I recommend it and plan to read more of Pam Jenoff's work. But please, dream team, wake up!

This is a book I would read again and again. Historical fiction that completely fascinated me. What a beautifully woven tale- but I could gush for pages. I remember when I was a kid and we learned about the Holocaust. I remember as a kid actually wondering if someone might have escaped Germany – as a Nazi – and moved to Thailand – because I met people who may have fit the description, as I was living in Thailand. I had learned enough in school and read enough on my own, even as an elementary-aged child, to have these thoughts. Yes, my imagination was always wild. The horseback riding instructors at the popular camp for young pre-teens in Thailand probably weren’t escaped Nazis. Even though they used to scrape our uneaten, chewed up bits of fried eggs off of our plates and eat them each morning. And shout in seemingly angry German (is there any other way?) at us as we tried to maneuver riding a horse. In the end, I was too sensitive for horseback riding camp. But, then as a high school graduate – yes, still a kid technically, at 17 years old – I made the trip to visit a concentration camp-turned-memorial in Austria. What a trip that was. To see the buildings, preserved as they were, kept intact to TEACH people what happened. Gas chambers, dissection tables, even blood stains still on the floor. Even at that age, as naive as I was on many levels, I knew the importance and that this must never happen again. And that I would fight injustice for the rest of my life. Bravo to Ms. Jenoff. Thank you for your writing. I cannot wait to read more of your work.

This a wonderful story, beautifully written. The characters are strong and very real. A Must read. I will look for more of Pam’s novels.

I read somewhere that this book was a cross between Water for Elephants and The Nightingale, both of which I have read and loved. Now Pam Jenoff has pulled off a slick trick and combined those two ideas into an intriguing and heart felt story which will resonate with me for some time to come. A Jewish woman, Astrid, married a German officer shortly before the war. He is pressured by the Nazis to divorce her as marriage to a Jew is forbidden. Astrid is the daughter of the owner of one of the well known circuses in Europe. But the Nazis have banned Jews from owning or performing in the show. In another story line, a Dutch woman, Noa, gave birth to a baby she had conceived with a German soldier, but she gives up the child to be raised by the Nazi party in one of their schools. She is devastated to lose the child when she changes her mind. She comes upon a railroad car loaded with Jewish infants who have been dumped one on top of the other, like a load of garbage and are dead or dying. In her grief over the loss of her own baby and her horror with the scene, she steals one of the infants to raise, and makes up a story that the male baby is her brother, Theo. Then she runs away into the woods to hide. Noa and Theo are saved by a circus worker and brought to the winter training facility where she meets Astrid who is hiding in plain sight from the Nazis. Astrid is an aerialist and she is asked by the circus owner to train Noa the tricks of the flying trapeze so that he can hide her out as well. That is just a small taste of the intrigue and action to come. I very much enjoyed this book for the unique storyline, action, romance and more. If you enjoy books set in Europe during the second war, you will like this one very much.

Questo romanzo è bellissimo. Avevo già letto anni fa 'The Kommandant's girl' e mi era piaciuto moltissimo, l'avevo trovato per nulla banale e anche coraggioso in alcune scelte narrative rispetto alla media di libri simili, tutti piuttosto scontati e anche compiaciuti nel calcare sulla lacrima facile e sul pathos legato all'Olocausto. Anche questo romanzo mantiene le promesse, sebbene con una scrittura molto semplice e non certo ricercata, riesce a dare una buona introspezione dei personaggi (anche qui non banali) e degli ambienti e situazioni. Se in alcuni momenti pare prevedibile dove andrà a parare e chi farà cosa, poi queste previsioni vengono regolarmente smentite, nel senso che finalmente gli eventi si svolgono in modo davvero originale e fuori dai soliti binari (non voglio spoilerare, ma la fine per me è stata inaspettata!). Oltretutto ci si affeziona veramente al 'cast' tanto che alla fine, a libro chiuso, si continua a pensare a loro come persone conosciute, anche per poco. In più l'ambientazione del circo è davvero sublime se si ama questo ambiente e se ne è affascinati, soprattutto se come me si sognava da piccoli di lavorarci come trapezisti! E' un romanzo consigliatissimo e credo che potrebbe diventare benissimo un film!

Hasta el momento uno de los mejores libros de pam... solo he leído 2 (ignoremos eso) la historia atrapante y muy interesante

At times, this was difficult to read and I had to break off and do something else. At other times I read into the small hours it was that compelling. Sensitively written and starkly portrayed at times, the story drew me in, painting vivid pictures of the situations being described. Circus life during the second world war, personal relationships that were deeply painful at times, but amazingly selfless and giving, created an unputdownable book. The ending wasn't predictable and surprised me. An excellent book and one I wholeheartedly recommend.